next up previous contents
Next: About this document ... Up: Demystifying intellectual property issues Previous: Academic research   Contents

Bibliography

1
AHARONIAN, GREG: [Patents] Economic assessment.
http://www.aful.org/pipermail/patents/2000-November/001096.html, 2000.

2
ARROW, KENNETH J.: Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions.
The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton Univ., 1962.

3
BOCH, RUDOLF: Das Patentgesetz von 1877 - Entstehung und Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung.
Rudolf Boch, Patentschutz und Innovation in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 1997.

4
BRONFMAN, EDGAR: Remarks As Prepared For Delivery by Edgar Bronfman, Jr.
Real Conference, San José, California, http://www.mpaa.org/copyright/EBronfman.htm, 2000.

5
COHEN, DANIEL: La propriété intellectuelle, c'est le vol.
Le Monde, 07 Apr 2001, http://www.lemonde.fr/rech_art/0,5987,170287,00.html, 2001.

6
COMMISSION, EUROPEAN: Green Paper on the Community patent and the patent system in Europe.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/intprop/indprop/558.htm, 1997.

7
COMMISSION, WIPO POLICY ADVISORY: World Intellectual Property Declaration.
http://www.wipo.org/about-wipo/en/pac/ip_declaration.htm, 2000.

8
FISHER, WILLIAM W.: The Growth of Intellectual Property: History of the Ownership of Ideas in the United States.
http://eon.law.harvard.edu/property99/history.html, 1999.

9
GILMORE, JOHN: What's wrong with content protection.
http://cryptome.org/jg-wwwcp.htm, 2001.

10
GISPEN, KEES: Die Patentgesetzgebung in der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus und in den Anfangsjahren der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Rudolf Boch, Patentschutz und Innovation in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 71-82, 1997.

11
HALBERT, DEBORAH: Weaving Webs of Ownership.
http://www.soc.hawaii.edu/ future/dissertation/TOC.html, 1998.

12
HALL, BROWNYN H., ROSE MARIE HAM: The Patent Paradox Revisited: Determinants of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1980-94.
NBER Working Paper No. W7062, http://papers.nber.org/papers/W7062/, 1999.

13
HOFFMANN, FRITZ: Beitraege zur Geschichte des Erfindungsschutzes in Deutschland im sechzehnten Jahrhundert.
Zeitschrift fuer Industrierecht Vol. 10 No. 8 85-93, No. 9 97-105 No. 10 109-118, 1915.

14
KINSELLA, N. STEPHAN: Against Intellectual Property.
Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol 15, no 2 (Spring 2001): 1-53, http://www.mises.org/journals/scholar/kinsella6.PDF, 2001.

15
KSORBER, ARNO: Patentschutz aus der Sicht eines Großunternehmens.
Rudolf Boch, Patentschutz und Innovation in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., 25-32, 1997.

16
LAFARGUE, PAUL: Socialism and the intellectuals.
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lafargue/works/socint.htm, 1900.

17
LEVIEN, RAPH: An open letter to the Ghostscript development community.
http://www.artofcode.com/ghostscript/openletter.html, 2000.

18
LUTTERBECK, BERND: Sicherheit in der Informationstechnologie und Patentschutz fuer Softwareprodukte - ein Widerspruch ?
http://www.sicherheit-im-internet.de/download/Kurzgutachten-Software-patente .pdf, 2000.

19
MACHLUP, FRITZ: Die wirtschaftlichen Grundlagen des Patentrechts.
GRUR, http://www.sffo.de/machlup1.htm, 1961.

20
MANSFIELD, EDWIN: Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study.
Economic Journal 91:907-18, 1986.

21
MILLER, ROBIN: Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer.
Slashdot, http://slashdot.org/articles/01/03/02/1422244.shtml, 2001.

22
NORDHAUS, WILLIAM D.: Invention, Growth and Welfare: a theoretical treatment of technological change.
The M.I.T Press, 1969.

23
PATTERSON, RAY: Copyright and ''the exclusive right'' of authors.
Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 1, No.1, Fall 1993, http://www.lawsch.uga.edu/ jipl/vol1/patterson.html, 1993.

24
PILCH, HARTMUT: Siemens-Telekommunikationsabteilungen gegen Swpat.
http://www.ffii.org/archive/mails/swpat/2000/Nov/0007.html, 2000.

25
PILCH, HARTMUT: Patentrezepte von Bulmahn.
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/doku/pe/archive/mails/swpat/2001/Jan/0140.html, 2001.

26
PLANT, ARNOLD: The economic theory concerning patents for inventions.
Economica,, 1934.

27
PROUDHON, PIERRE-JOSEPH: System of Economical Contradictions: Or, The Philosophy of Misery.
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/ch07.htm, 1847.

28
RENOUARD, AUGUSTIN CHARLES: Traité des brevets d'invention.
Paris, 1865.

29
RIDEAU, FRANSCOIS-REN´E: Patents are an economic absurdity.
http://fare.tunes.org/articles/patents.html, 2000.

30
SAKAKIBARA, MARIKO, LEE BRANSTETTER: Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1998 Japanese patent law reform.
NBER Working Paper Series W7066, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7066/, 1999.

31
SCHMOOKLER, JOSEPH: Invention and Economic Growth.
Cambridge, 1966.

32
SIETMANN, RICHARD: Elektronisch Publizieren: 'Public Domain' or 'Private Property' ?
http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/ mdmv/aktuelles/00-1_sietmann.pdf, 2001.

33
SMETS-SOLANES, JEAN-PAUL.
pers. comm., 2000.

34
WATSON, BRETT: Philosophies of Free Software and Intellectual Property.
http://www.ram.org/ramblings/philosophy/fmp/free-software-philosophy.html, 1999.

35
WINISCHHOFER, THOMAS: Computersoftware und Patentrecht.
http://webit.com/tw/, 2000.


Holger Blasum
2001-06-16